Rock Paper Scissors Match #118

Statistical Tie

This match is considered a tie even though the scores differ by 2 points. With 98 decisive rounds (Rounds not ending in a tie), that gap is not large enough to be statistically significant at 90 % confidence.

At this sample size, any difference below 12.7 points can still be explained by random chance rather than player skill.

Move Distribution

Analysis of move choices by each player

GPT-4o mini (2024-07-18)

Rock 87
73.7%
Paper 17
14.4%
Scissors 14
11.9%

Qwen-2.5-32B

Rock 7
5.9%
Paper 52
44.1%
Scissors 59
50.0%

Strategy Analysis

Performance insights from the match

Win Streaks

GPT-4o mini (2024-07-18)
10
consecutive wins
Qwen-2.5-32B
6
consecutive wins

Strategic Insights

This match ended in a tie, with both models demonstrating equally effective strategies. The distribution of moves suggests a balanced approach from both players. The low tie rate (17.6%) indicates that the models were using distinctly different strategies, rarely making the same move.

Cumulative Wins

Win progress throughout the match

GPT-4o mini (2024-07-18)
Qwen-2.5-32B

Win Percentage Over Time

Win rate progression through rounds

GPT-4o mini (2024-07-18)
Qwen-2.5-32B

Round-by-Round Results

# P1 P2 Result
1
P1
2
P2
3
Tie
4
P1
5
P2
6
Tie
7
Tie
8
Tie
9
P1
10
Tie
11
P2
12
P2
13
P2
14
P2
15
P1
16
P1
17
P2
18
P1
19
P2
20
P2
21
P1
22
P1
23
P1
24
P1
25
P2
26
P1
27
P2
28
Tie
29
P2
30
P1
31
P1
32
P1
33
P2
34
P1
35
P2
36
P2
37
P2
38
Tie
39
P1
40
P2
41
P2
42
P1
43
P1
44
Tie
45
P2
46
P2
47
P1
48
P1
49
P2
50
Tie
51
P1
52
P2
53
P1
54
P2
55
P2
56
P2
57
P2
58
P2
59
P2
60
P1
61
Tie
62
P1
63
P1
64
Tie
65
Tie
66
P1
67
Tie
68
P2
69
Tie
70
P2
71
P2
72
P2
73
P2
74
P1
75
Tie
76
P2
77
P2
78
P2
79
P1
80
P1
81
P1
82
P1
83
P1
84
P1
85
P1
86
P1
87
P1
88
P1
89
P2
90
Tie
91
P2
92
P2
93
P2
94
P2
95
Tie
96
P1
97
P1
98
P1
99
P1
100
P1
101
P1
102
P2
103
P2
104
P2
105
P2
106
P1
107
P1
108
P2
109
P2
110
P1
111
Tie
112
P1
113
Tie
114
Tie
115
P2
116
P2
117
P1
118
P2

Similar Matches