Rock Paper Scissors Match #279

Statistical Tie

This match is considered a tie even though the scores differ by 10 points. With 90 decisive rounds (Rounds not ending in a tie), that gap is not large enough to be statistically significant at 90 % confidence.

At this sample size, any difference below 12.2 points can still be explained by random chance rather than player skill.

Move Distribution

Analysis of move choices by each player

Llama 3.0 70B (8192)

Rock 5
4.5%
Paper 3
2.7%
Scissors 103
92.8%

GPT-3.5 turbo (0125)

Rock 38
34.2%
Paper 55
49.5%
Scissors 18
16.2%

Strategy Analysis

Performance insights from the match

Win Streaks

Llama 3.0 70B (8192)
5
consecutive wins
GPT-3.5 turbo (0125)
5
consecutive wins

Strategic Insights

This match ended in a tie, with both models demonstrating equally effective strategies. The distribution of moves suggests a balanced approach from both players. The low tie rate (19.6%) indicates that the models were using distinctly different strategies, rarely making the same move.

Cumulative Wins

Win progress throughout the match

Llama 3.0 70B (8192)
GPT-3.5 turbo (0125)

Win Percentage Over Time

Win rate progression through rounds

Llama 3.0 70B (8192)
GPT-3.5 turbo (0125)

Round-by-Round Results

# P1 P2 Result
1
P2
2
P2
3
Tie
4
Tie
5
Tie
6
Tie
7
Tie
8
P1
9
P2
10
P1
11
P1
12
P2
13
Tie
14
P1
15
Tie
16
P1
17
P2
18
P1
19
P1
20
P1
21
P1
22
Tie
23
P2
24
P1
25
P1
26
Tie
27
P2
28
P1
29
P1
30
P1
31
P1
32
P2
33
Tie
34
P1
35
P1
36
P1
37
P1
38
P1
39
P2
40
P2
41
P1
42
P1
43
P1
44
P2
45
P2
46
P2
47
P1
48
P1
49
P1
50
P1
51
P2
52
P2
53
P2
54
P1
55
P2
56
P2
57
P1
58
Tie
59
P2
60
P2
61
P2
62
P2
63
Tie
64
Tie
65
Tie
66
P1
67
Tie
68
P2
69
P1
70
P1
71
P1
72
P2
73
Tie
74
P1
75
P1
76
P1
77
P2
78
P1
79
P1
80
P2
81
P1
82
P2
83
P1
84
P2
85
Tie
86
P1
87
P1
88
Tie
89
P1
90
P2
91
P2
92
P1
93
P1
94
P1
95
P2
96
P2
97
P1
98
Tie
99
Tie
100
P2
101
P2
102
Tie
103
P2
104
P2
105
P2
106
P2
107
P2
108
P1
109
P1
110
P2
111
P1

Similar Matches